Author: Lisa Montague | Category: Business Intelligence & Reporting

Most nonprofits start in the wrong place.

They ask: "Should we use Wix, WordPress, or Squarespace?"

Or, if they're thinking bigger: "Should we build something custom? Or use newfangled AI tools like Replit?"

But before you answer either of those questions, you need to answer a harder one: What does your website actually need to accomplish for your mission?

Not what features sound nice. Not what competitors have. What does it actually need to do?

Three Completely Different Websites

For a nonprofit serving people experiencing homelessness, your website might need to:

- Help people find shelter resources in real-time

- Display current bed availability

- Accept donations

- Connect volunteers to opportunities

For a nonprofit focused on cancer support, your website might need to:

- Help patients find local resources and specialists

- Connect people to support groups

- Track referrals back to outcomes

- Personalize recommendations based on cancer type

These are completely different websites. The first is about real-time information accuracy. The second is about personalization and integration with your case management system.

For a foundation, your website might need to:

- Help grantmakers find relevant funding opportunities and understand eligibility

- Display grant guidelines, deadlines, and application requirements clearly

- Accept and manage grant applications (or direct applicants to an application portal)

- Show grant recipients and impact (for transparency and accountability)

- Provide financials and compliance reporting (tax forms, annual reports)

- Support two completely different user groups: applicants (nonprofits seeking funds) and stakeholders (donors, board members, and the public wanting to see impact)

This is yet another very different website. It's not about real-time resource availability or personalization. It's about clarity, access to information, and managing a workflow (applications).

The choices you make need to follow the mission needs, not the other way around.

Ask Yourself the Real Questions

Before you evaluate a single platform, get clear on this:

- What problems does your website solve, and for whom?

- Who exactly are these people, and why do they come to the website? (Be specific.)

- What data does the site need?

- How current does that data need to be?

- How personalized does the experience need to be?

Write it down. Be specific. This is your north star. Note that I haven't said a thing about the website being pretty yet. More about that next.

Once you know what your website needs to accomplish, the tool choice becomes easier. Because you're not shopping for features. You're shopping for a solution that serves your mission.

How It Looks

Here's the thing about "how a website looks."

While visual style builds initial trust, a website's success actually relies on information architecture and user flow. If you map out a clean path with good visual hierarchy and white space, users will naturally look at and do exactly what you want them to.

This concept is backed by decades of documented scientific research. In design and UX, it's highly studied and easily referenced.

What does this mean for you, the non-designer, non-UX-person who maybe has no idea what UX even means?

If you're using a modern platform with modern templates, and you had a designer customize your logo and style guide into the template's color palette, you'll automatically get the benefits of this research.

If you hire a reputable agency to design your custom site, they'll build customized modern templates that leverage the same principles.

Either way, unless you actively override your designers and information architects, you'll end up with templates that provide the clean path you need. Then it's up to you to use them properly. If the template asks for a paragraph and an image, give it a paragraph and an image—not a scientific paper and a weird video. If it asks for three bullet points, write three bullet points, not two paragraphs.

The Trap

Nonprofits pick a tool first, then try to fit their mission into it.

They see Squarespace. It looks easy. They build it. Six months later, they realize it can't integrate with their donor management system the way they need.

They build a WordPress website. They can't update it fast enough. Or it doesn't support the personalization their clients need. So they stop updating it.

Here's one I watched fail painfully. A nonprofit department was advised to build a portal using a "no-code tool." It was super cheap. It was super limited. The portal looked horrifically ugly. And then they realized it had to deep-connect to Salesforce using Salesforce APIs.

They spent half a year scraping together funds for those connections, which weren't cheap. Then a year passed with the vendor and their internal Salesforce administrator—untrained for this work—trying to make it happen. The portal never launched.

Start with mission. Understand your data and integration needs deeply. Only then, evaluate tools.

Not the other way around.

One Next Step

If you read this and thought "we might be walking into exactly this," let's talk. An initial conversation is usually enough to figure out whether there's a clear path forward or whether it's too early to act.

No pitch, no deck. Just a conversation. [Schedule a free consult here.]